A [short] review of 3 Body Problem and its relevance to today’s conflict.

8–12 minutes
<< ThunderstruckHow to drive a tank >>

Hi there and Happy Thursday. This week’s post is going to be short and disjointed because I spent most of the long weekend travelling. Any time I wasn’t travelling was spent eating chocolate. I didn’t get much chance to write.

A very rare image of The Director, taken last weekend

I told myself that I’d get loads of writing done on the plane on the way home, but I naively failed to account for the distraction of a squirming and restive toddler who was way past her bedtime. My wife points out that I could have written while said toddler slept throughout the flight, but also failed to account for my own sleepiness which, let’s be honest, is the real reason you’re getting a slap-dash post today.

Anyway, as luck would have it, I spent a considerable portion of the weekend re-watching Season 1 of 3 Body Problem on Netflix. I saw it within seconds of it first coming out in 2024, but decided that I needed to see it again in advance of the next season coming out. Here’s the trailer for Season 1:

Of course, having finished the last episode (again), I checked the release date for Season 2, and although there’s no official date yet, the best estimate is the latter half of 2026. Le sigh. You might have gathered this by now, but I’m an ardent fan. I devoured the trilogy by Cixin Liu which the TV series was based on:

Cover of 'The Three-Body Problem' by Cixin Liu, translated by Ken Liu, featuring a futuristic design with cosmic elements and a promotional note for the Netflix series adaptation.
Cover of the book 'The Dark Forest' by Cixin Liu, featuring a space-themed background with a planet and colorful cosmic elements, indicating its science fiction genre.
Book cover of 'Death's End' by Cixin Liu, translated by Ken Liu, featuring a futuristic and cosmic design with vibrant colors and abstract elements.

I may have to wait for more on-screen adaptation of my favourite tales of alien destruction, but unfortunately there’s plenty of real-world asymmetric warfare going on that’s quite resonant with some of the themes of this piece of fiction.

That’s what I’m going to do today: a quick review of 3 Body Problem but through the lens of the current Third Gulf War / US-Israel-Iran War.

First I’m going to talk about some of the similarities we can see between both situations, and then I’m going to delve into some of the strategic relevancies for today’s conflict. By way of major caveat, I am aware that 3 Body Problem is a work of fiction. I’m not using it to predict the future. For one thing, the humans and aliens in Liu’s novels and the Netflix series behave according to game theory, making decision based on their strategic objectives.

The humans on planet Earth, or at least some of them, appear to be acting irrationally. That’s the nicest way I can describe what President Trump is doing, although in the interests of balance I should point out that some people still see a coherent plan behind all this.

Enough preamble, let’s get into this. A warning, there are major spoilers ahead, including from the books. In other words, if you haven’t read Books 2 and 3, but have seen Season 1 of the TV show, you will find potential spoilers below.

Before we start, let me encourage you to subscribe to the blog using the link below. As always, I’d love to see your comments below, or you can contact me via webform here or email here. Finally, if you’ve enjoyed this post, please share it with a friend.

If you enjoy this blog and want to support it, please consider a donation. Keeping this blog going doesn’t cost much, but it isn’t free either, so any help would be very much appreciated👍

1. The similarities

3 Body Problem is about an advanced alien race whose own planet faces an unpredictable but eventual cataclysmic destruction. They hear about Earth and its bounties, decide to take it to save themselves, and prepare an invasion fleet to cover the four light year distance.

The aliens send an advance guard of “sophons,” quantum-entangled multi-dimensional particles which can see everything that humans say and do, and can mess with computers and eyesight to boot. Things don’t look great for humanity. These aliens are so far advanced that we might as well be bugs by comparison, a point which the aliens subtly reinforce by way of their aforementioned sophons:

A panoramic view of a city square featuring large digital billboards displaying messages such as 'YOU ARE BUGS' against an ominous sky, with a crowd of people below and iconic buildings in the background.

The TV show roughly (but not entirely) parallels the first book in Liu’s trilogy. Humanity struggles with the implications of its impending doom. The aliens will take four centuries to reach Earth, so we have time to prepare, but their sophons mean we can’t achieve any more scientific progress in the time we have. We’re stuck fighting the aliens with 21st century tech.

Some people realise the implications of this early on. They realise the need for asymmetric war, a term which I spoke about a few weeks ago and is relevant in today’s conflict.

Spot the bad beret.

Once the asymmetric war clip above caught my eye, I started noticing the other similarities between this fiction and reality.

The aliens can project power across vast distances, just like the US can against regional powers anywhere on Earth. Our planet is an open book to the aliens, just like the skies (and probably cyberspace) in Iran is to the US. The aliens can mess with human technology and make it do what they want, just like the US can mess with power grids or malware in uranium centrifuges.

To be clear, I’m not saying that Iran are the good guys here. The TV show isn’t saying that humans are the good guys, either. Ye Wenjie calls the aliens only because of the extreme brutality she witnesses during the Cultural Revolution. And Liam Cunningham’s Thomas Wade character is an amoral ends-justify-the-means sort of guy, as we can see most graphically during the attack on the Judgement Day. Warning: the clip below is extremely graphic.

Perhaps the most striking similarity is the “Wallfacer” program. The alien sophons can see and hear everything that humans do, but they can’t see inside our brains. The planetary defence folks hatch a plan to make use of this. So-called “Wallfacers” are tasked with devising anti-alien strategies. People have to do whatever they say, within reason, but they must never reveal the intent of their plans to anyone.

Iran prepared for the current war by decentralising command and control. No matter how many political and military leaders were killed (and quite a few were, due to the overwhelming technological disparities), lower level commanders were empowered to use their own initiative against Iran’s actual (or perceived) enemies. Hence the overwhelming attacks on Gulf States, when a rational leader might have used diplomacy and the threat of further attacks to get valuable concessions from them instead.

But we’re straying into the realm of strategic effect here, which brings me on to my next point. Again: serious spoilers ahead if you haven’t read the novels.

2. The strategic lesson (with major spoilers)

I’ve already written about how the US is kicking ass in this war from a tactical point of view, but is pretty muddled about its operational aims, and utterly devoid of a broader strategy. “Tactical triumph, operational obscurity, and strategic shambles,” was the quote I used nearly a month ago, and the picture hasn’t changed.

This brings me to the biggest parallel between fiction and reality. In 3 Body Problem, the aliens set a course for Earth to kick us out and take our house. They have an overwhelming technological advantage over us and can interfere in our affairs to prevent us ever getting the upper hand over them in that sense. Nothing to worry about.

Or is there? In the second book, the weaker humans, the “bugs” in the aliens’ reckoning, figure out a way to defend themselves. They set up a communications system with a dead-man’s switch which will broadcast Earth’s location as a message in all directions. The aliens are afraid of other, more powerful aliens who might hear this and come and destroy them.

There’s a teaser for this in the enigmatic conversation between Ye Wenjie and Saul Durant in the graveyard. It’s ostensibly a bad joke about Einstein playing the violin in heaven, but it works as a metaphor for the Dark Forest hypothesis which got its name from the second Liu book (and hopefully the second season of the Netflix show).

Does this have any relevance for the current war? Absolutely. This work of science fiction illustrates the asymmetry of a conflict of survival.

The weaker party in any encounter can prevent the stronger party achieving their strategic goal if the weaker party is willing to sacrifice itself to harm the stronger one. A regime (e.g. Iran’s) which is facing an existential threat, can lash out in all directions and close the Strait of Hormuz, its lifeline to the world. Although it may be dealing extraordinary damage to itself, it is also dealing an unacceptable level of damage to its stronger and more powerful adversary (the USA).

We also see a form of this in the cold logic of mutually assured destruction, which I’ve also written about on these pages before.

Conclusion: My verdict on 3 Body Problem

The situation in the Gulf is changing quickly. As I write, President Trump appears to have accepted an Iranian ten-point plan as the basis for negotiations. In other words, the Iranian regime has gotten what it wants. In other, simpler words, it’s won.

Or, at least, it’s won in its own telling of the narrative. For the weaker party in an asymmetric war to “win,” it only needs to avoid defeat. For the thousands of dead civilians in Iran, this may not feel like a “win.”

In the fictional world which inspired this post, the strategic “win” for humanity is similarly bitter. It happens only after a humiliating military defeat at the hands of the aliens. More importantly, it commits humanity to a policy of willing self-destruction and destroys any ideal of interstellar peace and love and cooperation.

I’m such a lover of this science fiction franchise that I can’t give an honest verdict on its TV adaptation. There are plenty of valid criticisms about how they changed the setting and chopped up some of the plot points. Honestly, any book adapted for the screen needs to go through a process like this. I think it’s a faithful representation of an extraordinarily ambitious and rewarding book.

I sincerely hope that the next two seasons are as good. Season 1 was expensive to make, at about $20 million per episode. The next two seasons will have fewer episodes to cut costs: six episodes in Season 2 and five in Season 3, despite their source material being longer. It words out at:

  • Season 1: 50 pages per episode
  • Season 2: 85 pages per episode
  • Season 3: 120 pages per episode

I’m quietly optimistic. More isn’t always better, and too many film and TV franchises today err on the side of bloat simply because they can. The third book, Death’s End, will be a particularly challenging one to adapt for television.

I won’t give away the ending but anyone who has read it will agree with me when I say that I sincerely hope there are no parallels between what happens at the end of Cixin Liu’s story and what may happen on this fragile world of ours.

That’s all for this week. Thanks for reading and please remember, if you haven’t already, to subscribe using the link below. Please also share this article with a friend and help me broaden my reach. Every little helps! See you next week.

Cover picture and all figures not otherwise noted: 3 Body Problem, Netflix (2024)

5 responses to “All the tech, still losing”

  1. Loren Pechtel Avatar

    No, this isn’t actually a problem with asymmetric warfare. Rather, the root of the problem is that a willingness to do evil is a powerful weapon. Iran isn’t winning because they are decentralized, but because they have a knife to the world’s throat in the form of the straight. Iran for the most part isn’t fighting us, it’s simply playing terrorist and we are taking the path of appeasement. And the genocides across Africa will increase as Iran has learned the world doesn’t have the stomach to stop their evil.

    Note that I am absolutely not a supporter of The Felon. He’s almost certainly the worst thing that has happened to our country. That doesn’t make Iran not a problem.

    1. The Director Avatar

      I think the two are related. If we go back to the science fiction world (another massive spoiler ahead), the reason humanity ultimately gets wiped out is because it loses the will to do extreme evil.

      If Iran’s leaders were replaced with people with an iota of conscience, then arguably it would be in a worse place in this war. But I may also be pushing the analogy too far.

  2. Basil Marte Avatar
    Basil Marte

    More importantly, it commits humanity to a policy of willing self-destruction and destroys any ideal of interstellar peace and love and cooperation.

    Not quite. Yes, it does commit humanity to a policy of MAD. However, it doesn’t destroy the possibility of peace and cooperation — the author started from the assumption that such a thing is impossible in the first place.

    Apart from the author’s general pessimism/misanthropy (the humans collapse the MAD setup by electing just about the worst candidate, etc.) and not knowing how this is properly done (the aliens commit some howlers, too), there is also some subtly wrong math (and the less subtly wrong popularization thereof) to be blamed here. Namely: game theory is math. Math is quite famously the same everywhere. Thus we can assume that for the most part, aliens will have the same math as we do.

    Now, at the time game theory was first being worked out, people already asked the question: what happens if two copies of a person (or algorithm) are made to play against each other, and they know this, in any of the favorite games (e.g. prisoners’ dilemma)? Alas, trying to properly answer this created a bit of a self-reference problem that was difficult to deal with, so at first mathematicians simply ignored it. The result is known as Causal Decision Theory. This is the one that produces the infamous headline result of “always defect in the Dilemma”, that rational aliens would do so, and therefore (to generalize) interstellar peace and/or cooperation is impossible, and (assuming the story’s premises) it is inevitable that conflict would flatten the Universe (and the only way to at least delay that fate is to hide).

    It should be intuitive that this is wrong — surely any person we would deem “rational” would find a better use for a mirror-magic portal than to punch themselves in the face. Indeed, it is wrong. Eventually (alas, several decades “eventually”) mathematicians did mostly grapple the self-reference problems out of the way, creating Logical Decision Theory, which does cooperate with itself. However, by that time there has been decades of popularization blaring the “»rational« (read: CDT) agents always defect!” conclusion. (I can’t help but suspect that they blared this so enthusiastically precisely because it is counterintuitive.)

    Thus I would caution against drawing lessons from this work on the premise of “the humans and aliens in Liu’s novels and the Netflix series behave according to game theory, making decision based on their strategic objectives“. Taking it from one end: that premise is false (again, the most obvious case is when the humans collapse their previously established MAD by electing an unsuitable candidate). And from the other end: taking the premise seriously, and analogizing it to the sorts of things people like to say about the earthly political situation, one would conclude that e.g. the West should fight a total war with Iran (and Russia, and China, in whatever order). The only questions are the when and the how, not the whether — because such a war is inevitable, you see, many commentators will say out loud. (As in, many do say it out loud.) Which is one of the cardinal sins of strategic thinking.

  3. […] All the tech, still losing >> […]

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Military Realism Report

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading